TopTrades
Copy Trades from Traders around the World
TopTrades
Sierra Chart and MetaTrader were not built to solve the same problem. Sierra Chart is a futures-focused charting and execution engine prized for raw exchange data and a footprint chart that barely strains under heavy tick volume. MetaTrader is something else entirely — a Forex and CFD platform with the broadest broker network in retail trading and an enormous library of Expert Advisors built on MQL4 and MQL5. On paper, the two rarely cross paths.
In practice, plenty of traders end up needing both. Someone who watches futures order flow in Sierra Chart all day may still hold a Forex or metals CFD account simply because that's where their broker relationship sits, or because their preferred instrument, gold or crude oil for example, is only available as a CFD through their MetaTrader broker rather than as a tradable futures contract.
A Sierra Chart to MetaTrader trade copier bridges that gap. Instead of watching a setup develop on a Sierra Chart and then switching screens to manually place the corresponding Forex or CFD order, the copier reads the trade out of Sierra Chart and reproduces it inside MetaTrader automatically, handling the conversion from contracts to lots and the symbol matching along the way.
This article covers how that connection works, what changes when bridging a contract-based futures platform into a lot-based CFD environment instead of another futures platform, and where this particular pairing tends to make the most sense.
Table of contents:
It helps to start with what each platform is actually good at, because the differences explain almost everything about how a copier between them needs to behave.
Sierra Chart earns its following through direct exchange and data-vendor feeds, an ACSIL programming interface for building custom studies, and a charting engine that keeps running smoothly under volumes that bog down heavier platforms. It is, first and foremost, a tool for traders who care about precision in futures price action.
MetaTrader earns its following somewhere else entirely. MT4 and MT5 are supported by thousands of brokers worldwide, run an enormous catalog of Expert Advisors and custom indicators, and remain the easiest on-ramp for traders moving between demo and live Forex or CFD accounts. Few platforms make it simpler to open an account with a new broker and start trading the same day.
Traders bridge the two for a handful of practical reasons: a broker may only offer gold or oil as a CFD rather than a true futures contract, a trading idea developed in Sierra Chart might apply just as well to a correlated currency pair, or a trader may simply prefer to keep a diversified book that spans both futures and Forex without manually duplicating every decision.
At a mechanical level, Sierra Chart sits on one side as the source of trading activity, and one or more MetaTrader terminals sit on the other side as the destination. Sierra Chart typically exposes order activity through its DTC protocol or a comparable bridge, while the MetaTrader side runs a small Expert Advisor that listens for incoming instructions and places matching orders inside MT4 or MT5.
The mechanics sound similar to copying between two futures platforms, but two pieces of this process work very differently once MetaTrader is on the receiving end: position sizing and symbol matching. Both deserve their own explanation.
Sierra Chart trades in futures contracts. MetaTrader trades in lots. These are not the same unit, and a copier that simply applies a 1:1 ratio without understanding the underlying contract specifications will get position sizing wrong almost immediately.
A standard Forex lot represents 100,000 units of the base currency, but CFD lot sizes for metals, energy, and indices vary considerably from broker to broker. Futures contracts, on the other hand, have fixed, exchange-defined specifications that never change. Bridging the two means defining, per instrument, exactly how many lots on the MetaTrader side correspond to one contract on the Sierra Chart side.
| Futures Contract | Contract Specification | Common MetaTrader Equivalent | Conversion Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold (GC) | 100 troy ounces | XAUUSD | Often close to 1:1, but confirm your broker's lot size for XAUUSD before assuming parity |
| Crude Oil (CL) | 1,000 barrels | USOIL / XTIUSD | Broker lot sizes for oil CFDs range from 100 to 1,000 barrels per lot |
| E-mini S&P 500 (ES) | $50 per index point | US500 / SPX500 | Convert using point value rather than a flat lot ratio |
| Euro FX (6E) | 125,000 EUR | EURUSD | Roughly 1.25 standard lots per contract |
Because CFD contract specifications differ by broker, this table is a starting point rather than a fixed formula. Any trader setting up this kind of copier should confirm the exact contract size their MetaTrader broker uses for each CFD before trusting an automatic conversion with live capital.
Symbol mapping between two futures platforms is mostly a naming exercise. Mapping a futures contract to a MetaTrader CFD is a bit more involved, because the two instruments aren't always priced against the same reference.
A futures contract has a fixed expiration and is priced based on the exchange's settlement mechanics. A CFD like XAUUSD or USOIL typically tracks a spot or near-month reference price with no expiration at all. The two prices usually move together, but a basis difference, the gap between futures and spot pricing caused by factors like storage costs or interest rate differentials, means the two accounts won't always show identical unrealized profit even while holding the same direction and a correctly converted size.
Traders setting up this kind of bridge should expect to maintain their own symbol mapping table and revisit it whenever a futures contract rolls to a new expiration month, since the CFD side of the mapping rarely needs to change while the futures side does every quarter.
Trade copiers between Sierra Chart and MetaTrader can run locally, with both platforms on the same machine, or remotely, with Sierra Chart and the MetaTrader terminal split across different computers connected over the internet.
This particular pairing leans toward remote setups more often than most. Many MetaTrader brokers already encourage clients to run their EAs on a VPS for uptime reasons, so it's common for the MetaTrader side of the copier to already be living on a hosted server before Sierra Chart even enters the picture. Traders who haven't looked into hosting yet may want to start with this guide on why professional traders use VPS servers for trade copying.
Because futures margin and CFD margin behave so differently, the risk settings that matter most here are not identical to a same-asset-class copier.
Rather than a flat contract-to-lot ratio, many traders cap MetaTrader lot sizes as a function of account equity, since CFD margin requirements and leverage limits vary so much from futures margin.
Futures markets observe daily maintenance breaks and settlement windows that Forex and most CFDs simply don't follow. A copier should be aware of these gaps so it doesn't misinterpret a maintenance halt as a closed position, and so it respects each market's own trading hours.
Hard caps on lot size per symbol protect against a mapping error sending an oversized order to the MetaTrader side.
Internet drops affect the MetaTrader side just as easily as the Sierra Chart side, so automatic reconnection and position resynchronization matter on both ends of the bridge.
These considerations sit alongside the broader principles covered in our guide to copy trading risk management, applied specifically to a setup that spans two very different margin systems.
Futures and CFDs draw liquidity from different sources, so even a flawless copier won't produce identical fills between a Sierra Chart position and its MetaTrader counterpart. A few things contribute to this:
None of this makes the setup unreliable, but it does mean a trader should expect the two accounts to show similar, rather than perfectly identical, profit and loss on any given trade. Anyone unfamiliar with why this gap shows up in copied trades generally may want to read this explanation of what causes trade copier slippage before assuming a setup issue.
A trader who builds systematic signals in Sierra Chart may want to apply the same logic to a correlated currency pair, copying gold futures setups into a Forex CFD account without rebuilding the strategy from scratch.
Because MetaTrader has such a large retail user base, some traders who develop strategies natively in Sierra Chart use a copier to distribute those signals to MetaTrader followers. Traders interested in this path can read more about how to become a trade signal provider on TopTrades.
Some traders use a futures position in Sierra Chart, crude oil against the Canadian dollar is a common example, to hedge or complement a related Forex position held through a MetaTrader broker.
Not every broker provides direct futures access. Traders whose broker only offers a CFD version of an instrument they want to track from Sierra Chart rely on this kind of bridge to keep both sides of their trading consistent.
Yes. A single Sierra Chart master can distribute trades to several MT4 or MT5 follower terminals at once, each with its own lot conversion and risk settings.
In most cases, yes. Because CFD contract specifications vary by broker, traders should confirm and set their own conversion per instrument rather than relying on a default ratio.
Yes. A properly built copier can send orders to either MetaTrader version, and some setups support copying into both at the same time.
Not exactly. Futures and CFD pricing come from different liquidity sources, so fills will typically be close but rarely identical.
Yes. Orders generated by an ACSIL system in Sierra Chart are treated the same as manual trades and can be reproduced on the MetaTrader side.
A session-aware copier should recognize scheduled maintenance windows so it doesn't misread a temporary halt as a closed position.
Yes. Symbol and instrument filtering lets traders restrict copying to specific markets rather than mirroring every trade placed in Sierra Chart.
Not strictly, but it's common, since many MetaTrader brokers already recommend VPS Hosting for Expert Advisors regardless of trade copying.
Yes. Attached stops and targets are translated and synchronized along with the entry order on the MetaTrader side.
A reliable copier should reconnect automatically and resynchronize open positions once communication is restored.
Yes. Equity-based sizing is common in this pairing because futures margin and CFD margin don't scale the same way between accounts.
It can be, particularly for traders who execute from Sierra Chart but hold a funded account with a broker or firm that operates on MetaTrader.
The full TopTrades Trade Copier platform supports Sierra Chart, MetaTrader, NinjaTrader, and cTrader, including cross-platform connections like the one described here.
TopTrades builds the same cross-platform engine used in our Sierra Chart to NinjaTrader connection to support a Sierra Chart to MetaTrader bridge, with the lot-conversion and symbol-mapping tools this particular pairing requires.
Traders who want a broader comparison of how trade copying stacks up against placing every order by hand can read our piece on the benefits of a trade copier versus manual trading, or start with the fundamentals and learn what a trade copier does.
Create your free TopTrades Copy Trading account to get started, or contact us to discuss connecting your Sierra Chart and MetaTrader accounts.
Watch the video demonstration to see the trade copier in action.
Sierra Chart and MetaTrader sit on opposite ends of the trading platform spectrum, one built around exchange-grade futures data, the other built around broad retail access to Forex and CFDs. That difference is exactly why a copier between them is useful: it lets a trader keep the precision of futures analysis without giving up access to the instruments, brokers, or audience that only exist on the MetaTrader side.
The trade-off is that this bridge requires more care than copying between two futures platforms. Contract-to-lot conversion, basis differences between futures and CFD pricing, and session mismatches all need to be accounted for rather than assumed. Done correctly, though, a Sierra Chart to MetaTrader trade copier turns two platforms built for different markets into a single, coordinated trading operation.
TopTrades